I am writing in response to a series of problems literature review and in response to the question: Is it better to use a memory consultant before or after writing this chapter?
There seems to be a wide range of dissertators who have begun writing their review of literature in general-Chapter 2-without understanding the purpose of this chapter. As called for a review of the literature, many writers’ beginners think that everything that is at issue is to describe the existing research, an activity which is entirely mechanical. In fact, while this chapter May formulas seem very little is actually a mechanical and much more analysis is that, furthermore, it requires thorough preparation to provide the foundation that integrates this research specialized in general and those areas where the reader must recognize it. The novice dissertation writing committee is not always reliable in indicating the gaps until it is too late, the chapter is composed wrongly and dissertator is blocked with material that must now be a punched in good shape.
The important function of this section is to place the current research on the ground and putting in place the current research of originality. It must be clear why this work has inherent value to a specialist audience that is supposed to be a field day with and aware of the issues. The literature is manipulated to show the reader why this book deserves the attention university.
Literature review of the problems occurs too often, there is a limit to the extent of the ethical intervention thesis consultant can provide, and it is painful to have to refuse assistance when the problem lies in the actual composition of the literature review. May you can not help someone who is writing something they do not understand, especially in a budget, and written without knowing how the material is supposed to work. It suffices to mention the source and talk about results do not provide a basis easy for a consultant to intervene.
Obviously, on the site advisor is to blame, but nobody can get great satisfaction with a problem during the quarter. And the problem May resulting in the education system itself: some schools issue clear guidelines for their dissertators, and most authors do not seem to have much of an organization orientation. Also, most dissertators are oriented magazines for their research, where the brevity of most presentations in the academic journal articles does not lend itself to an extrapolation to the memory either format.
The best way to offer a literature review is to find sources that are allied in some way with what you want to express and explore ways to make that work talk to your audience on your behalf, or, conversely, find sources that are contrary to some extent, and where that voice was wrong vies-Ã -vies your own idea-which is supported by all other sources, of course. If you can find the arguments and introduce in the text, even if you can not fully express, at least you'll have a good review of the literature, and a memory consultant will be able to whip your chapter in good shape for you.
Before the chapter is writing a dissertation help consultant can more easily help in terms of content and direction? While working on how to present the existing literature, the consultant may suggest what might help and where to look for it. It is also ethical to help achieve some mechanical aspects of compiling references to feed into the centre of work in this section.
But it would be unethical-which means that the work could not be regarded as original to the author if the consultant has produced the argument that places this research in the field. Assisting the present and improving the organization, flow, and focus on the extent of what can be done once the chapter has been composed.
So, if there is a problem, it is probably better to start with a thesis consultant who can lead you through the process of developing arguments. It could really bear fruit in the last analysis.